Writings on various social issues:
Written by Archpriest Joseph F Purpura
taken from his book: Moral and Ethical Issues: Confronting Orthodox Youth Across North America
Given the divisiveness of this issue in contemporary
Teens were asked three different forms of this question in the survey. They were first asked, “Is it right or wrong to have an abortion for reasons other than to save the life of the mother?” to which 67 percent said it was wrong, only 5 percent said it was right and 27 percent were unsure. They were then asked, “Is it right or wrong to have an abortion to save the physical life of the mother?” to this question 38 percent saw it as right, which is the one occasion upon which the Church understands the possible need for a couple to choose to have an abortion, 20 percent saw it as wrong and 41 percent were unsure if it was right or wrong. Teens were then asked, “Is it right or wrong to have an abortion for any reason?” less than 3 percent thought it was right, 63 percent thought it was wrong and 33 percent were unsure if it was right or wrong. It was clear from the survey that while a slim majority saw abortion as wrong, in all three scenarios, at least 3 out of 10 teens were not sure whether having an abortion was right or wrong. Abortion is an issue on which teens receive many mixed and conflicting messages.
Youth workers ought to help teens discern what they believe on this issue and to help teens come to an understanding of what and why the Church holds the position she does on abortion. While lecturing or sermonizing may appear to be the best way to convey this information it is often ineffective in assisting the teen to incorporate this belief into his or her own belief system. It is often more beneficial to allow teens to enter into a free dialogue on this issue. One of the goals of that dialogue is to help teens see that the Church views all life as precious and that when we devalue anyone’s life no matter how early in development or how late in late in life, we devalue and dehumanize all life.
We know from the survey that one of the most effective ways of teens understanding and accepting the Church’s teaching on abortion is for both parents and clergy to dialogue with them on this issue.[1]OP Part of the strategy of having parents and clergy work together on this issue ought to involve spending time with the parents, so they better understand the Church’s teaching on abortion and can better articulate it to their children. Providing the opportunity in youth group and at retreats for teens to dialogue on this issue also provides opportunities for teens to articulate and better understand their own position on abortion. I have found it helpful at retreats to provide a group of teens with materials on the Church position on abortion (a sample of which is provided below) or any other issue for that matter and ask them to study the material (20 minutes or more) and then have them present the Church’s teaching on this subject to their peers. I find at least two things happen through this process: first teens take the task seriously when they know they will be getting up in front of their peers and secondly both they and their peers listen more intently to the material. I have found that simply exposing them to the teaching of the Church in a non-threatening open dialogue allows them to better understand the Church’s position. In hearing the Church’s position, which is very logical and loving, most teens are ready to accept it. I believe that most teens want to do that which is right; they simply need to hear and be taught what is right and what is wrong. Teens are ready to accept and incorporate the truth into their lives, but they need to hear the message and be allowed to freely discuss, debate and then own this truth.
The following material on abortion is an example of material that I would give to both teens and adults in preparing them to discuss the issue of abortion. I do not feel a need to give them views opposing that of the Church as I feel they already have been inundated with that material. Further, my intent here is to convey to them the Church’s teaching on abortion. In fact, when I ask teens to give a presentation on the material, I specifically ask them to present the Church’s teaching, not their own or anything else that they have already learned elsewhere. This is important because they need to clearly hear the Church’s teaching so they can place their personal beliefs on this issue along with other views alongside that of the Church. In seeing these positions side by side the logical discerning teen will easily see the Church’s teaching as the only logical option, though I want them to come to that conclusion through their own thought process. Again, the purpose here is not simply that the teens accept the Church’s view as their own, but that they accept and incorporate all of the issues surrounding the teaching; that killing is wrong, that all life is precious, that God loves all of us, that God is the source of life, that procreation is participation in the life creating action of God, and so forth.
The Church teaches that God is the source and sustainer of life and that He created us as male and female with a purpose in mind. The Church views sexual relations between a husband and wife as something very sacred and good and, in fact, when it bears life, the Church views this action as participating in the very action of God’s Creation. The Scriptures say that God became man so that we might become one with Him. Here in this very action of sexual intercourse, when it bears fruit and a child is conceived we already have a foretaste of becoming one with God, by sharing in the creative life giving action of generating life. “For in sexual intercourse, it is not only the seeds of physical being that are united, but also a soul. A father and mother not only transmit their physical characteristics to the child, but they also transmit its soul. This sacred power man possesses of continuing God’s creation with Him is indeed a great wonder.”[2] Hence, to generate life is participation in the Divine Life. The Church opposes abortion, because abortion consciously stops the process of life already begun. Since God is the source of life, and once the woman’s egg is fertilized and if allowed to grow and develop in the woman’s womb, it will result in the birth of a child. Therefore, any intervention at any point once that process has begun (conception) results in the ending of life and a rejection of the wonderful gift of life and the ability to generate life given to us by God. Hence, it is not only a rejection of the gift of a new life, but rebellion against God’s creative energy and love.
Abortion is not a new controversy brought about by new technologies and understandings of our body. Abortion is an ageless controversy struggled with and recorded at least from the time of Hippocrates, the ancient Greek “father of medicine.” Until recently, doctors who took the Oath of Hippocrates[3] swore not to give poisonous drinks that would abort a fetus. In Roman law abortion was considered a major crime and in the New Testament a fetus was considered a life already begun. The New Testament Gospel written by the physician Luke, has as its beginning, the conception of two children. The first, John the Baptist, the one called to prepare the way of the Lord and the second, the Christ Child, the Messiah, God Incarnate. We read in Luke the account of these two conceptions:
In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of
He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High;
and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David,
and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever;
and of his kingdom there will be no end.”
And Mary said to the angel, “How shall this be, since I have no husband?” And the angel said to her,
“The Holy Spirit will come upon you,
and the power of the Most High will overshadow you;
therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.
And behold, your kinswoman Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For with God nothing will be impossible.” And Mary said, “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.
In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a city of
Likewise, the Church in Her liturgical life recognizes these two conceptions by setting aside feast days nine months before the Church celebrates each of these births. For example, in the case of Jesus Christ, while the Church celebrates His birth on December 25th, she also celebrates His conception on March 25th; In the case of Mary the Church celebrates Her birth on September 8th and Her conception on December 9th; in the case of John the Baptist his birth on June 24th and his conception on September 23rd. Both the scriptural accounts and the liturgical calendar make a statement concerning the Church’s belief that life begins at conception. In the case of our Lord, March 25th is one of the major Feast Days of the year. The Church believes it is at the moment of conception life has been given and begins; She marks these days with great celebration and sacredness. In the great feast of the Nativity of Mary (September 8th) celebrated as the first feast of the Church New Year (which begins on September 1st) one reads concerning Mary, that she was chosen by God before she was even conceived: “Come, all ye believers, let us hasten to the Virgin; for behold she was forechosen a Mother to our God before she was conceived in the womb…”[4] It appears that even before conception God has plans for our life.
In keeping with the scriptural teachings the Apostles spoke out against abortion, “Do not murder; do not commit adultery; do not corrupt boys; do not go in for sorcery; do not murder a child by abortion or kill a new-born infant.”[5]Q Barnabas, one of the early Church writers, said, “You shall love your neighbor more than your own life. You shall not slay the child by abortion. You shall not kill that which has already been generated.” (Epistle of Barnabas XIX, 5) St. Basil writes, “Those who give potions for the destruction of the child conceived in the womb are murderers, as are those who take potions which kill the child.” (Letters, CLXXXVIII, Canon 8) St. John Chrysostom considered the abortionist as “even worse than a murderer.” (Homilies in Romans, XXIV) St. Gregory of Nyssa writes: “There is no question about that which is bred in the uterus, both growing and moving from place to place. It remains, therefore that we must think that the point of commencement of existence is one and the same for body and soul.” (On the Soul and the Resurrection - Gregory of Nyssa) Modern Orthodox theologians continue with the thought pattern found in the writings of the Fathers. John Meyendorff, writes, “The fact that this interruption takes place makes, of course, a psychological difference, but does not change the nature of the act of abortion being killing, and as such a very grave sin. Because killing is evil . . . ” (“The Orthodox Church” [Newspaper] October 1972). Again, “. . . human life begins at the moment of conception and all who hold life as sacred and worthy of preservation whenever possible are obliged at all costs to defend the lives of unborn children regardless of the stage of their embryonic development.” (“Seminar in Medical Ethics,” St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, Vol. 17, no 3, 1973, p. 246.)
Stanley Harakas, one-time professor of Ethics and Morality at
One of the most common arguments used by supporters of abortion on demand is that a woman's right to privacy extends to control over what happens within her own body, including the contents of her uterus. This argument was accepted by the Supreme Court (as far as the first three months of pregnancy are concerned) in its 1973 decision on abortion. Some advocates of this position go so far as to refer to the nascent life as a cancerous growth, or "piece of extraneous tissue", that has invaded the mother's womb. Orthodoxy rejects such notions due to the great value attached to life by God, and the fact that life is a gift which no person has the right to take. If we do not have the right to take our own lives, how much more so must it be that we have no right to take the innocent life of the embryo or fetus in the womb? If our bodies are "temples of the Holy Spirit" as we profess, then to kill an innocent human being is a crime, not only against that person, but also against the Holy Spirit. That the developing persons inside the mother's womb has a life separate from its mother is evident from the fact that its chromosomal makeup is different from the mother's since it is a combination drawn from both mother and father. Further, it is genetically unique; its particular combination of traits and characteristics shall never be repeated.
Further he writes;
A second argument commonly made by those who favor abortion "rights" is that, particularly if the removal of the nascent life occurs during the first few weeks of pregnancy, no human person, or person who is "fully human" has been destroyed. They also claim that unwanted children will not have the opportunity of developing into "responsible personhood," or will jeopardize the "personhood" of parents and siblings, due to the added burden they impose. In opposition, we profess that no human being is ever fully a "person", but that all persons have the potential to become "fully human", to achieve union with God. Therefore, we cannot declare on the basis of "personhood" that the fetus in the womb has no value, or lesser value in the eyes of both God and man than a person born.
Further supporting Fr. Harakas’ statements are the effects that new medical technology is having upon the abortion rights movement. This new technology supports the fact that the fetus is not a "piece of extraneous tissue", but a visible child in formation:
Faye Wattleton, former head of Planned Parenthood, was crushed to learn that women’s attitudes on abortion are not what she supposed they were. A poll conducted by Wattleton’s new group, the Center for Gender Equality found that 53 percent of American women think abortion should be allowed only after rape or incest, to save a woman’s life, or not at all. Only 28 percent said abortion should be generally available, and 70 percent want more restrictions.
Another sign of slippage in support for abortion shows up in UCLA’s annual national survey of the attitudes of college freshmen. Support for legal abortion dropped for the sixth straight year. In 1990 it was 64.9 percent. Now it is a bare majority, 50.9 percent. The
Declining support for abortion owes something to the gruesome details that emerged in the debate over “partial-birth” abortion. Improvements in ultrasound imaging also tend to undermine abortion, cutting through the abstractions of “choice” and “reproductive rights” and showing pregnant women how much a fetus resembles a newborn. When ultrasound video shows the fetus in 3-D, support for abortion could drop further.[6]
Aside from the theological and technological arguments, are the inherent human emotions surrounding the tragedy of abortion. One common comment heard by this author from young women who have chosen to have an abortion is that they were encouraged or strongly convinced to have an abortion. Often these women had been encouraged to seek abortion as a solution by their own parents or other relatives, friends, teachers and advisors. The tragedy is that often this council is misguided and the young woman never really comes to terms with her own feelings on this issue until it is too late and she recognizes that she has ended a life – a life conceived and carried in her own womb, a life given and taken by her own choice. A similar comment appears in the February 5, 1999 Greek Orthodox Observer Newspaper,[7]
While researching her book, Real Choices: Listening to Women, Looking for Alternatives to Abortion, writer Frederica Mathews-Green came across a recurring theme. “As I traveled the country holding ‘listening groups’ with women who had abortions, I always asked, ‘What situation caused you to make this decision?’ I expected to hear tales of financial woe, yet nearly 90 percent of the women told me they had had their abortion because of a relationship – because someone they loved, a boyfriend or a parent, told them to. When asked what anyone could have done to help them complete the pregnancy, over and over the answer was: Just stand by me. “If only I had one person to stand by me.” Writes Mrs. Mathews Green.[8]
Many teens, including teens in the Orthodox Teen Study, are either unaware or confused about the teachings of the Church on abortion or have chosen to believe otherwise. Much like Frederica Mathews Green it is the belief of this author, as partially demonstrated in an earlier chapter, that relationships really do matter. Many of our teens that believe abortion is wrong, aside from their intrinsic human emotions, because they have been guided and nurtured by others who believe the same. It is not unexpected that one out of every four teens are unsure if abortion is right or wrong, even when allowing it in the case of a mother’s life being at stake.[9] Young people from the youngest of age are presented with abortion as an acceptable and legal solution to a pregnancy crisis and a right to be had upon demand, even without parental consent in the case of minors. They hear of the ease of obtaining an abortion but seldom of the physical, emotional, and spiritual pain and suffering, let alone of the suffering and the end of life for the child. It is the hope of this author that more qualified, loving adults will stand by young people and share with them just how precious life is and that even when serious mistakes or sins, like pre-marital sex take place, resulting in pregnancy, the life created is still precious, belongs to God. Although intercourse takes place outside of marriage without the blessings of God (hence sinful), the creation of life is still participation in the divine creative action of God. Choosing an abortion is not taking responsibility for a choice to participate in God’s creative action and further compounds the first sin and effectively leads to death of part of oneself and certainly of the life created.
An issue confronting even married couples that want to keep their child is the increasing pressure from doctors to conduct prenatal tests and recommendations of aborting children whose tests show that the child may be born with physical or psychological defects. Here again, Harakas’ words, that none of us are fully human nor will reach our full human potential until we see God in His Kingdom, gives a good indication as to where the Church stands on this issue. One might ask, who are we to determine what constitutes a full human being and that even a child born with handicaps, no matter how severe, is still capable of seeing, feeling and participating in God’s majestic beauty of creation and His presence, albeit maybe differently than we may think and perceive, none-the-less as capable and maybe even more free to enjoy His presence. Another difficult area for many to accept is the case in which a rape results in a pregnancy. The Orthodox Church’s position is that even in the unfortunate and uncontrollable instance of rape, abortion is not a solution. Here perhaps is one of the most difficult choices a young woman may be called to make, when she has been violated, to carry the violator’s baby to term. Perhaps this is where she can take control and choose good over evil, choose to give life rather than destroy and unlike her perpetrator, grant life and joy if not to herself in keeping the child, then in offering the child to a loving couple through adoption. Parents, who themselves have been violated by their child being violated in instances of rape or incest, often want the solution that seems to offer the quickest solution for the child and all involved. Choosing abortion, while it may seem to be the quickest of choices, in fact itself leaves many more scars for the person already victimized. The author is very mindful of the violation that has taken place, and offers the wisdom of the Church as a possible means to real healing. It is the belief of this author that the person violated by rape or incest, is again violated through abortion and that by carrying and bearing the child and offering the child up for adoption to a loving couple can very well be a source of healing and strength at this most difficult time. In any of the instances above, the choice to abort or not to abort has much to do with those surrounding the young person and what they counsel and support. Fr. John Kowalczk reminds all of us surrounding those dealing with a crisis pregnancy:
Any involvement in an abortion; having one, performing one, condoning one, is an action against God. Abortion can be termed a hostile act of rebellion against God’s very work of creation. And do not the words “hostile rebellion against God” sum up the very essence of the work of Satan?[10]
[1] See Parental and Clergy effect on teens views concerning Abortion in Chapter 3
[2] Rev. Fr. John Kowalczyk, An Orthodox View of Abortion (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Gopher State Litho Company, 1977), 6-7
[3] See the appendix for the text of the Hippocratic Oaths from the 5th century BC and the present.
[4] From the Aposticha of Vespers of the Fest of the Birth of the Theotokos, September 8, by the hymnographer Sergius, as found in the The Divine Prayers and Services of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of
[5] Didache, Teachings of the Apostles II,2
[6] John Leo, “The Joy of Sexual Values,”
[7] This quote appeared in an article concerning an Orthodox Movement entitled “ZOE for Life!” which is a pregnancy outreach for women and exists to help young unmarried women who have chosen to bring their child to full term. It is a movement to help young women complete their pregnancy and either keep their child or place the child with an adoptive family. ZOE for Life can be reached at 1-440-893-9990.
[8] Eleni Daniels, “Zoe for Life! Crisis Pregnancy Outreach for Women,” The Orthodox Observer, (
[9] As mentioned earlier, the one case when the church understands a couple’s decision to have an abortion is when a choice needs to be made concerning saving the physical life of the mother when the alternative is that mother and/or child will die if there is no intervention. This is not saying in this instance this is not killing. The Church still recognizes that the choice is made to kill the child in the womb, but the decision is understood when, if no action is taken, both or at least the mother will die. It is here, in consultation with their spiritual father that the couple makes the decision to save the mother’s life, leaving it to the mercy of God and praying for restoration of health and soul, well aware of the sacrifice being made to save a life. Again, the emphasis is on saving and preserving life as best one can. Typically the choice is without intervention both will die. It is not considered an affront to God to try and save at least one of those lives. Though even and perhaps especially here the mother and father will still bear the loss of a child and all that surrounds that real loss.
[10] An Orthodox View of Abortion, Rev. Fr. John Kowalczyk, p. 7
When teens were asked in the Orthodox Teen Survey, conducted this past year, “In the past twelve months how many times did you go out drinking with your friends” this is what they said:
Never: 56.71%
1-2 Times: 13.04%
3-6 times: 1.77%
More than 6 Times: 2.03%
“Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you were bought with a price; therefore glorify God in your body.” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
The Church’s rational for being opposed to alcohol and drug abuse is found in
Other drugs, from cigarettes to marijuana, to heroin all fall into the category of having virtually no benefit and only harm to the body, mind and spirit, aside perhaps from some controlled medical uses. Here the user again puts him or her at great risk of harm. Not only is there often loss of control and judgment, but also from the start the body is harmed. Such abuses of the body can be classified as a form of indirect suicide, in which the continued use of such substances over time will lead to the deterioration of the body and eventual death. If we take seriously the fact that our bodies are the temples of the Holy Spirit, where God dwells, then it becomes incumbent upon us to keep the body pure, healthy and sound. The Church puts the emphasis on the sacredness of the body and is why we are called to care for it, nurture it and protect it from all forms of defilement and harm. In caring for the body, keeping the body sound and pure we also provide for our spiritual wellness and wholeness. The Church has always spoken of the person as a whole human being; the Church has always emphasized the sacredness of both body and soul. In fact, the Resurrection accounts of Christ in the Scripture, emphasize Jesus was raised both in Body and Spirit. By caring for one’s body and keeping it pure, healthy and strong, a person also helps keep their spiritual life in order, as by disciplining the body one allows their spiritual life to guide them, rather than the cravings of the body.
“Pressure to drink and smoke weighs on girls as well as boys at a young age”
By Fr Joseph Purpura
One of the most requested workshops that I present to both teens and parents concerns drinking, smoking and other drugs. The Orthodox Teen Survey conducted in 1999 revealed that drinking and smoking of cigarettes amongst Orthodox Church going Teens is prevalent. For example Thirty percent of Middle School Girls say they have at least tried smoking cigarettes, as have nearly 28% drank alcohol while out with their friends in the previous year. Similar numbers appear for Middle School Males and the numbers increase as teens hit their High School Years.
|
School Years |
Smoked Cigarettes |
Drank Alcohol out with my friends in the previous 12 months |
|
OrthodoxMiddle SchoolFemales |
30% |
28% |
|
OrthodoxMiddle SchoolMales |
46% |
30% |
|
OrthodoxHigh SchoolFemales |
59% |
61% |
|
OrthodoxHigh SchoolMales |
67% |
63% |
Aside from the immediate health risks involved in these actions, as well as the fact that these actions are illegal, we know from this and other studies that cigarettes and alcohol are gateway drugs that can and often do lead to other drugs and other serious risk taking behaviors amongst teens. Those who smoke and or drink alcohol are more likely to also engage in pre-marital sexual relations (heterosexual and homosexual), more likely to struggle in school and have difficulty in their relations with their parents.
As Orthodox Christians, we need to take these behaviors seriously and to better educate our young people as to the sacredness of their bodies. Through our teaching and our own behaviors, we want our young people to know that as Christians they expected to care for and nurture the gift of their body that God has given them. We want them to do this so they can live a fuller human life and be better able to glorify God and live the life that God has enabled us to live.
A recent Study conduct by the National Institutes for Health, conducted amongst 4,200 Middle School Teens concerning drinking and alcohol abuse clearly show that peer pressure greatly influences whether teens participate or not in these behaviors. The study concluded that, “the single most important factor is the behavior of their five closest friends (even more so for girls than boys according to the study), he says. In step with other recent studies, Simons-Morton also found that parents involved in their children’s lives — engaging in regular conversations, attending after-school events, listening to their problems — were less likely to have children who drink or smoke.” (Pressure to drink and smoke weighs on girls at a young age - USA Today reported on January 24, 2001 p. 8D)
Parents, Pastors and Youth Workers are encourage to talk and listen more often to young people concerning the issues confronting them. Teens who want to make good choices in their life style, should review the friends with whom they spend their time. Additionally teens will want to consider one of the most revealing outcomes of the Orthodox Teen Survey, shown in part in the table below. — Teens who read the Bible on a daily and/or weekly basis were significantly more successful in making good decisions in comparison to peers who did not read the Bible on a frequent basis.
|
Read the Bible at least |
Drank alcohol with Friends in the past 12 months |
Smoked Cigarettes in the last month |
Smoked Marijuana |
Had Premarital Sex |
Dissatisfied with life |
Attend Church at least once a week |
|
Daily |
2.0% |
1.5% |
0.8% |
0.6% |
0.2% |
93% |
|
Weekly |
6.0% |
2.5% |
1.9% |
1.1% |
0.8% |
95% |
|
Less than weekly |
35.0% |
20.7% |
15.0% |
7.6% |
7.0% |
60% |
In a step to better inform the faithful of Church Teachings concerning Social Issues, the Orthodox Church of Russia, issued an easily understood statement. This statement in its totality is on the web at http://www.antiochian.org... under “Social Issues”.
As an example of this statement the section concerning alcohol abuse is printed below:
An excerpt from:
BASES OF THE SOCIAL CONCEPT OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
XI. 6. The Bible says that «wine maketh glad the heart of man» (Ps. 104:15) and «it is good... if it be drunk moderately» (Sir. 31:27). But we repeatedly find both in Holy Scriptures and the writings of the holy fathers the strong denunciation of the vice of drinking, which, beginning unnoticeably, leads to many other ruinous sins. Very often drinking causes the disintegration of family, bringing enormous suffering to both the victim of this sinful infirmity and his relatives, especially children.
«Drinking is animosity against God¼Drinking is a voluntarily courted devil¼Drinking drives the Holy Spirit away», St. Basil the Great writes. «Drinking is the root of all evils¼The drunkard is a living corpse¼Drinking in itself can serve as punishment, filling as it is the soul with confusion, filling the mind with darkness, making a drunk prisoner, subjecting one to innumerable diseases, internal and external¼Drinking is a many-sided and many-headed beast¼Here it gives rise to fornication, there to anger, here to the dullness of the mind and the heart, there to impure love¼Nobody obeys the ill will of the devil as faithfully as a drunkard does», St. John Chrysostom exhorted. «A drunk man is capable of every evil and prone to every temptation¼Drinking renders its adherent incapable of any task», St. Tikhon Zadonsky testifies.
Even more destructive is ever increasing drug-addiction – the passion that makes a person enslaved by it extremely vulnerable to the impact of dark forces. With every year this terrible infirmity engulfs more and more people, taking away great many a life. The fact that the most liable to it are young people makes it a special threat to society. The selfish interests of the drug business help to promote, especially among youth, the development of a special «drug» pseudo-culture. It imposes on immature people the stereotypes of behavior in which the use of drugs is seen as a «normal» and even indispensable attribute of relations.
The principal reason for the desire of many of our contemporaries to escape into a realm of alcoholic or narcotic illusions is spiritual emptiness, loss of the meaning of life and blurred moral guiding lines. Drug-addiction and alcoholism point to the spiritual disease that has affected not only the individual, but also society as a whole. This is a retribution for the ideology of consumerism, for the cult of material prosperity, for the lack of spirituality and the loss of authentic ideals. In her pastoral compassion for the victims of alcoholism and drug-addiction, the Church offers them spiritual support in overcoming the vice. Without denying the need of medical aid to be given at the critical stages of drug-addiction, the Church pays special attention to the prevention and rehabilitation, which are the most effective when those suffering participate consciously in the Eucharistic and communal life.
Taken from the Jubilee Bishops’ Council of the Russian Orthodox Church
Bases of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church,
August 13-16, 2000
Copyright (c) 2000 Communication service
of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate
Adress: 22, Danilovsky val, Danilov monastery DECR, 113191 Moscow, Russia
Fr Joseph Purpura’s Note:
In August 2000, the Orthodox Christian Church of Russia released an important document (approximately 60 pages in length) dealing with current social issues. Parents, educators and teens ought to read this document in its entirety. Many of our young people and parents may be unfamiliar with the Church’s teaching on these issues and they are encouraged to read this document to familiarize them with the Church’s teaching.
The full text of this document is on the Youth section of the Archdiocese Web Site and listed under social issues: http://www.antiochian.org/youth/
Youth Workers and other Christian Educators are encouraged to discuss these issues with our young people, encouraging them to understand the Church’s teaching on these vital issues.
by Archpriest Joseph F Purpura
Taken from his book: Moral and Ethical Issues: Confronting Orthodox Youth Across North America
Another issue upon which teens exhibited a degree of confusion was that of homosexuality. Nearly one out of four teens were unsure whether homosexuality was right or wrong. When it came to equating homosexuality with the act of sex between people of the same sex the percentage of teens who saw homosexuality as right behavior dropped significantly. While 185 were not sure whether homosexuality was right or wrong, when they were asked if it was right or wrong for two people of the same sex to have a sexual relation only four of them said it was right and ninety-seven were unsure, while eighty-four stated it was wrong. A similar response was found from those who stated that homosexuality was right in question eighty-four of the survey. While fifty-one teens in question eighty-four said homosexual relations were right, only twenty-one of them said it was right for two people of the same sex to have a sexual relationship with one another (question 91). Further, of the fifty-one whom though homosexual relationships were right, only three of them have had a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex. Only three of the twenty-six teens that had sex with someone of the same sex as they thought homosexual relationships were right.
One might want to ask here how much of an influence has the current teachings on “tolerance and acceptance” of other lifestyles led to one out of every four teens being unsure whether homosexuality is right or wrong. Interestingly in this survey when teens were asked, “Is it right or wrong for someone else to have sex with a person of the same sex as them” the “not sure” dropped to 17 percent and when asked if it was right for them to do so, it dropped even further to 11 percent. In each case more teens respectively said it was wrong behavior. Young people in their everyday life are being confronted with the homosexual life style as normal and good, whether it is on television, the movies, at school, and in society in general. What just a decade ago was a hidden lifestyle, today is much in the open and promoted as acceptable and even protected by law in many states. College students, particularly females, state that on many college campuses it has become the fad to experiment with this lifestyle and this behavior is seen even in high school and middle school.
It is significant that just over one quarter of the teens in the survey had neither a parent or clergyman speak to them concerning homosexuality and that over one half had only one of these two people speak to them on this issue. This is significant when one looks at the data in the survey and realizes that a number of teens are not equating homosexuality with what the term means in terms of behavior. It evident from the survey, that honest and frank discussion on homosexuality needs to take place with teens. As a Church, we want our teens to be able to discern what is right and wrong for them and even for others, so that they can help their peers and eventually children make good decisions regarding their lifestyle. An important part of the discussion on homosexuality ought to be on what homosexuality is and what it means in terms of our relationships with one another and with God. The following overview on homosexuality might be utilized in discussion with teens. This material may be used in preparation for a discussion or as a hand out to teens to discuss.
Homosexuality is not new; writings as far back as the Old Testament deal with this issue. What is new in American Society is the public display and promotion of this lifestyle and its protection by laws. Much of what was earlier said before about sexual relations outside of marriage applies to homosexual relationships. The Scriptures and the Fathers of the Church speak out on this issue and classify this behavior as unnatural and immoral.[2] Adding to the complexity of this issue is the current claim that homosexuals may be genetically[3]UVpredisposed to such behavior and therefore cannot help themselves but behave this way. Whether one accepts this argument or the argument that children become homosexual in reaction to unhealthy adult relationships, is to demean such individuals by saying that they have no control over their passions or own personal direction in life. Whether heterosexual or homosexual we are all called to control our passions. Sex outside of marriage for a homosexual person is as wrong as it is for a heterosexual person. To claim one has more control over not sinning than the other is to deny personal freedom and the ability to fully choose one’s actions. It is to say that the homosexual has less control over their urges than the heterosexual does and that one is freer than the other. The claim that they are naturally attracted to people of the same sex, so it is acceptable, is no more appropriate than the claim that a heterosexual person is attracted to people of the opposite sex and therefore should be free to express their sexual urges at anytime and with anyone they desire of the opposite sex. Likewise, the argument of genetic predisposition again demeans the person as saying they are incapable of choosing to do right. It is much like the argument of conducting genetic tests to see if someone is predisposed to be a thief or murder and therefore categorizing them and even limiting their activities just because they may posses such a gene, with no consideration for their own struggle to do right and refrain from acting on such predispositions. The Church calls us to be caring and loving to all people, but this does not mean that in loving all people we must accept all behavior as good. The Church has long taught that we are called to love all people but not all behaviors. When one condemns homosexual conduct, he or she condemns the conduct not the person. Despite the homosexual persons failings, we are still called to love them as a person, to treat them with respect, as we would expect to be treated in our own personal failing.
Harakas in his book Contemporary Moral Issues, clearly outlines the Church’s teaching on homosexual acts:
Regarding homosexual acts, the traditional and exclusive teaching of the Church is condemnatory, seeing such acts as morally wrong. In the face of homosexual acts as well as all other expressions of wrongful sexual expression (fornication, adultery, prostitution, incest, bestiality, masturbation) the Church teaches that the only proper place for the exercise of the sexual function is in marriage. The evidence from the sources of the faith, without exception, considers homosexual acts as morally wrong. In the Old Testament, we read “If there is a man who lies with a male as those be with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act. (Leviticus 20:13. Also, 18:22). Grave punishment was visited on the city of
“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the
The patristic tradition is no less unanimous and clear-cut in its judgment. From the 2nd century Didache of the Twelve Apostles, through the writings of the Fathers of the Golden Age of the Church such as St. Basil, St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine, St. Gregory of Nyssa (4th and 5th centuries), through the sixth century Code of Justinian, the Canons of St. John the Faster (early 7th century) to the decisions of the 21st (1972), and 23rd (1976) Clergy-Laity statement on Homosexuality by the Standing Conference of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas, released in March of 1978, the teaching is consistent and unvarying: homosexual acts are immoral and wrong.[4] W x
Paul D. O’Callaghan writes in the Journal of Christian Bioethics,
Consideration of the divine design and purpose of sex immediately reveals why homosex, adultery, fornication, prostitution, masturbation, and all other forms of sex outside of marriage are morally deviant. In none of these acts can the true realization of oneness in communion occur, because they are outside the God-established marital union, violations of it, or fundamentally disordered. All of these are true of homosexuality. Since the unitive drive for the experience of union is realized in the conjuntio oppositorum, the desire of man and woman to recreate their original oneness in Adam, it is clear that the desire for union with the same sex is a disordered passion. Something is very wrong when a male seeks to complete himself by union with another male. This is why the Apostle Paul argues that homosexuality is “against nature” (see Rom. 1:26-27). It is not just that the particular genital acts are ill fitted, unusual, and abhorrent. It is the fact that the very nature of the homosexual drive is at odds with how God created us as human beings, in His image, as male and female.[5]
[1] What can be said of homosexuality also applies to Lesbian relationships
[2] Romans 1:26
[3] There is current evidence that there is no “homosexual gene”, according to a study published in the, Science, during the week of April 25, 1999. George Rice and colleagues at the
[4] Harakas, Contemporary Moral Issues, 93-94
[5] Paul D. O’Callaghan, “Pseudosex in Pseudotheology”, Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality. April 1998, 93
|
Orthodox Church in America Synodal Affirmations
|
|
Contents
|
||
|
|
|
|
These affirmations on marriage, family, sexuality, and the sanctity of life are issued by the Holy Synod of Bishops on the occasion of the Tenth All-American Council of the Orthodox Church in America. Miami, Florida, July 1992 |
||
[111]“Orthodox Church in America: Synodal Affirmations on Marriage, Family, Sexuality, and the Sanctity of Life,” July 1992. Reproduced with permission from http://www.oca.org/OCA/Al... Internet; accessed 5 March 1999.
by Archpriest Joseph F Purpura,
taken from his book: Moral and Ethical Issues: Confronting Orthodox Youth Across North America
It is not surprising that one out of every four teens are unsure if it is right or wrong to have sexual relations prior to marriage, given how much teens are inundated with sexual messages and images in their daily life, starting from the pre-teen years. The fact that only 5.57 percent of teens in the survey thought pre-marital sex was right is remarkable given the pervasive exploitation of young males and females in the media as sex objects and the constant portrayal of sex outside of marriage as normal and an everyday event without consequences. We need to better equip teens to make good choices concerning sex and to be able to see through the multitude of sexual messages they receive on a daily basis. We want teens to see themselves as important, valuable and sacred, despite the messages they receive to the contrary, which tend to debase both males and females. Simply teaching teens that sex is bad is insufficient and tends to leave teens further confused as to why they are having the physical and psychological feelings and urges that come along with puberty and thereafter. In fact this approach typically leads teens to feel that they themselves are bad for having these feelings and for being attracted to people of the opposite sex.
One of our goals ought to be to develop within the hearts and minds of teens that virginity is something very good, something to strive for until marriage, and something not to be embarrassed about possessing, but in fact an accomplishment to be proud of keeping. We want them to remain virgin until marriage, not simply because they did what they were asked in not having sex, but that they valued themselves, the person they will marry, their relationship with God, and sex itself. Teens ought to see sex as something very sacred and good and therefore an act not lightly undertaken. For that matter, we want them to understand that the consequences of a sexual relation are something that they carry with themselves throughout their life. They do not forget it or the person they had sex with, because they give up to the other person a very special part of themselves in the bonding that takes place in a sexual relationship. The bond created in having sex with another person is very real and does not simply disappear once the relationship ends.
We should strive to help teens remain virgin (or stop having pre-marital sex) because we care about them now and care about their future marriage relationship. Sexual relations that occur outside of marriage are brought into the marriage in one form or another and can stand as an impediment to the marriage being successful. One who has had sex outside of the marriage and has experienced the breaking up of that relationship often finds it more difficult to be able to fully and freely give of himself or herself to the other person. When a relationship breaks off there is always hurt and pain in that separation, and this is especially true when sexual relations have been involved. All of us, teens and adults alike, build up walls to protect ourselves against past hurts. People who have broken off relationships tend to be more protective of their feelings and emotions with the next relationship. Having sex within a relationship is a life-changing event that greatly intensifies the depth of the relationship and therefore the intensity of the hurt at separation and therefore typically entails the building of higher and stronger walls to protect one when the next relationship comes along. We want our young people to be successful in marriage and to enjoy the full intensity of the marriage relationship and that includes being able to give themselves fully, freely and totally in their sexual relationship in the marriage. In fact, being able to fully and freely give oneself to one’s spouse through sexual relations is essential to the health and well‑being of the marriage relationship.
The survey strongly indicates an association between whether teens believe sex outside of marriage is right and whether they themselves engage in pre-marital sexual relations. [1] The obvious place to begin with preventing pre-marital sexual relations amongst teens is to begin with their attitude concerning sex and other related issues. We know from the survey that parents and clergy can have a profound impact on teen’s attitudes concerning pre-marital sex. [2] It therefore makes sense that parents and clergy work together to discuss these issues with teens and dialogue with them about making good choices regarding their sexual purity.
Consideration should be given to providing opportunities where teens can safely spend time with their peers and learn to engage in healthy relationships with peers of the opposite sex without feeling pressured to have sex. These may be opportunities where both male and female teens can meet in well supervised events, free of alcohol and other drugs that tend to make pre-marital sex that much more likely to occur. [3] S Likewise, efforts should be made to reduce, as much as possible, opportunities for males and females to be alone with one another, on such occasions as dating alone or no adults being home when teens are home from school and have a friend over. According to the survey, teens who did not have an adult present in the home when they arrived home from school were more than twice as likely to have had a sexual relationship than their peers who had an adult present when they arrived home from school.
Parents may want to give consideration towards discouraging their teens from dating during their early teen years, as statistically younger teens who dated were much more likely to have engaged in sexual behavior. The number of times a young teen had dated also raised the likelihood that they would be sexually active. For example, 20 percent of thirteen year olds who dated had intercourse, 8 percent of fourteen year olds, 7 percent of fifteen year olds, 12 percent of sixteen year olds, 21 percent of seventeen year olds and 29 percent of eighteen year olds. One can assume that not all eighteen year olds had sex only when they were eighteen, but may have had sex at an earlier age. Those teens that had not dated over the previous 12 months had no instances of pre-marital sex with the exception of seven teens, three of who reported being forced to have sex. In short adults can help teens remain virgin, by dialoging with them on what is appropriate, supporting them to remain virgins, consider placing more controls on dating, and to provide safe opportunities where teens can interact with their peers of the opposite sex, free from the pressures of feeling they are expected to have sex. The following material is offered to assist those dialoging with teens on the issue of sexuality.
The Church’s view on Pre-marital sex
The Scriptures, writings of the Church Fathers and current theologians are all consistent in their view that sexual relations belong only within marriage. Sexual relations outside of marriage attempt to express a relationship and union which do not exist, a fact that eventually becomes evident in all such relationships. Sexual relations are seen as something good and necessary within marriage as an expression of a union (oneness) and commitment between husband and wife, neither of which exist outside of marriage. What is written in this section concerning pre-marital sex certainly also applies to sex outside of one’s own marriage and in fact extra-marital affairs add the consequence of breaking the marriage commitment and oneness of that marriage, a break which is often irreparable.
The Scriptures abound with prohibitions against pre-marital sexual relations, not because as some would say, “God does not want us to have fun,” but because God loves us, understands us, and knows that such relationships can only bring harm, sadness and brokenness. In the book of Matthew, Jesus speaks concerning fornication (sexual relations outside of marriage):
And he called the people to him and said to them, “Hear and understand: not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man.” Then the disciples came and said to him, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?” He answered, “Every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” But Peter said to him, “Explain the parable to us.” And he said, “Are you also still without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach, and so passes on? But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a man. For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.” (Matthew 15:10-20)
For you were called to freedom, brethren; only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love be servants of one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” But if you bite and devour one another take heed that you are not consumed by one another.
But I say, walk by the Spirit, and do not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh; for these are opposed to each other, to prevent you from doing what you would. But if you are led by the Spirit you are not under the law. Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the
If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit. Let us have no self-conceit, no provoking of one another, no envy of one another. (Galatians 5:13-25)
And in Ephesians Paul writes:
Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.
But fornication and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is fitting among saints. Let there be no filthiness, nor silly talk, nor levity, which are not fitting; but instead let there be thanksgiving. Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the